AFGHANISTAN
&THE BRITISH RAJ AT RGSSA:
THE
FIRST "AFGHAN WAR"
Continuing the theme of Afghanistan. (See the May 2013 posting
for the first entry.) The Afghanistan exhibition curated by the Royal
Geographical Society of South Australia is about to travel to Whyalla. It
offers a unique opportunity to view some of the RGSSA's oldest books with links
to Central Asia and the Islamic civilisations, plus interesting artefacts, 19th-century
works of travel and exploration, and a selection of books, articles and
photographs relating to the Afghan cameleers who helped to open up Australia's
Outback.
The
blog is focussing on the books which give firsthand accounts of Afghanistan as
it was gradually and very painfully revealed to the West during the 19th
century.
The
First Afghan War, 1839-1842
The
First Afghan War, as the British called it (First Anglo-Afghan War, sometimes
called "Auckland's Folly"), was fought against Afghanistan by the
forces of British India, the Army of the East India Company, from 1839 to 1842.
It effectively ended with the one of the greatest disasters in British military
history: humiliatingly, not a pitched battle, but the ill-conceived and
appallingly badly managed retreat from Kabul. 4,500 British-led Indian soldiers
and 12,000 camp followers died.(1)
Prelude to War: "Bokhara" Burnes
By the
1830s Russian expansionism led the British to fear a possible Russian invasion
of India by way of Afghanistan. The British government therefore decided to
send an envoy to Kabul to form an alliance with Afghanistan's Amir Dost
Mohammad Khan against Russia. "Whoever they chose to lead such an
expedition would have to be a man of exceptional qualities; the endeavour, and
its dangers, would be the equivalent of a pioneering trek to the South Pole, or
the first flight to the Moon. The man they chose would need to be able to
withstand mountain passes and deserts, the threat of bandits, of being held
hostage or sold into slavery. More than this, he needed to be an expert in
languages, to possess an intimate knowledge of native culture, to have a gift
of affability, of making friends in difficult circumstances, and above all to
be observant: a sponge for current and reliable information, that might be
brought back and presented to the government in Delhi as it pondered its
policy. Fortunately for them, the hour presented the man: the one to undertake
this task would be Lieutenant Alexander Burnes."(2)
 |
| "Bokhara" Burnes in the costume of the country |
It was
this Scottish soldier's first great expedition that earned him the nickname
"Bokhara Burnes":
Burnes, Alexander, Sir, 1805-1841.
Travels into
Bokhara : being the account of a journey from India to Cabool, Tartary and
Persia ; also, Narrative of a voyage on the Indus, from the sea to Lahore, with
presents from the King of Great Britain, performed under the orders of the
supreme government of India, in the years 1831, 1832, and 1833.
London : J. Murray, 1834. 3 v.
Burnes
had joined the Army of the East India Company as a lad, and once in India
showed extraordinary abilities, earning rapid promotion. He also, remarkably
for a British officer, learned Hindustani and Persian. He had been serving in
"Kutch" or "Cutch" (Kachchh), in western British India when
in 1831 he was appointed to lead a British party to Lahore, in the
north-eastern Punjab in what is now Pakistan, the ostensible reason for the
trip being to take a gift of horses from King William IV to Maharajah Ranjit
Singh.(1) Lahore was not under British rule: it was then the capital of the
powerful Sikh Empire, and Ranjit Singh was an important and influential ruler.
Lahore lies on the Ravi river, which flows west and then south-west in the
Punjab, joining the Chenab River, a tributary of the Sutlej, and thence of the mighty
Indus.
The
Indus "had not been navigated by Westerners since the days of Alexander
the Great; knowledge of it was scanty, and as with Afghanistan, the government
in Delhi was conscious it needed to know more about the territories beyond its
borders."(2) It would be a river journey of over 1,000 miles. Burnes
carried out the mission "in an exemplary fashion, collecting scientific
and cartographic data on the one hand, whilst also using his diplomatic talent
to maintain good relations with the tribal chieftains and nobles in the regions
through which he passed—all suspicious of the motives of the explorer."(2)
His book gives a unique account of the opulence of court life under Maharajah
Ranjit Singh.
During this trip he met the deposed Afghan
ruler Shah Shuja (or Shuja Shah) Durrani at the British station of Ludhiana. Significantly,
Burnes didn't think much of him; he wrote: "I do not believe that the Shah
possesses sufficient energy to seat himself on the throne of Cabool; and that
if he did regain it, he has not the tact to discharge the duties of so
difficult a situation"(2). Truer words were never written. The British
authorities' misguided reinstatement of Shah Shuja was to lead to their
crushing defeat in the First Afghan War.
Mission to Afghanistan
The
expedition to Bokhara (Bukhara) was a great success and led to Burnes's next
appointment, the mission to Afghanistan. His posthumously published account is:
Burnes, Alexander, Sir, 1805-1841.
Cabool : being
a personal narrative of a journey to, and residence in that city, in the years
1836, 7, and 8.
London : J. Murray, 1842.
After
the success of his venture up the Indus, the organisation of this second
mission was left up to Burnes. Both his own experiences and the example of
earlier European travellers to Afghanistan decided him to travel light, with no
display of either military power or wealth to incite an attack. He took only
three companions.(2) On his way through the Punjab he again called in at
Lahore, where he encountered a Frenchman, a "M. Court" who had come
over from Persia by way of Afghanistan. His advice about the safest way to
travel in the area prompted Burnes to dress in the local Afghan clothes and get
rid of his European tents, beds, chairs and so forth. As a result, he made it
through safely. It was not to be the marauding tribesmen who would be
responsible for his death in the country, but the stupidity of his military
superiors.
Burnes's wonderfully detailed account of
his journey, encompassing Jalalabad, Kabul, Bamiyan, Kunduz, Mazar-i Sharif and
much more gives an astoundingly unprejudiced and appreciative picture of all he
observed: the way of life, the natural features, the architecture, the wild
flowers in bloom on the hills and the formal gardens of the towns, and all the
local variations in religious observances and beliefs. He actually discussed
theology with the locals, in spite of M. Court's warning that it was a risky
topic. "Most important of all, he was able to understand the contemporary
politics of the country, by meeting and conversing with many of the chiefs and
leading men. ... With his characteristic charm, he was able to form close
relations with many members of the ruling Barakzye family in Peshawar and
Kabul".(2)
The Amir Dost Mohammad Khan
Of
these the most important was the Amir Dost Mohammad Khan (1793-1863), who had
become Amir of Afghanistan in 1826 after the decline of the Durrani dynasty and
the exile of Shah Shuja Durrani to the Punjab. Burnes discovered that he was a
highly intelligent man with an active mind, and their wide-ranging discussions
led him to the conclusion that "Dost Mohammed was the only person with the
acumen and vigour to re-unify the Empire of Afghanistan."(2) The Amir was
willing to become an ally of the British and Burnes realised that with only a
little help he would be the man to help prevent Russian encroachments into
northern India.
 |
| The Amir Dost Mohammad Khan in later life |
Tragically, as it would turn out, Lord
Auckland, the Governor-General of British India, ignored Burnes's
advice—largely, it seems, because Dost Mohammad wanted British help to regain
Peshawar, on the north-West Frontier, which the Sikh Empire under Ranjit Singh
had seized in 1834.(3) Thus "Auckland's Folly".
British Reinstate Shah Shuja as Amir, & Advance into Afghanistan
 |
| The reinstated Shah Shuja holds court |
Taking
the advice of Sir William Hay Macnaghten instead, Auckland decided to reinstate
the deposed Shah Shuja Durrani as Amir. Troops of the Army of the East India
Company marched into Afghanistan in March 1839, reaching Kandahar on 26 April. Shah
Shuja was proclaimed as ruler, and the deposed Dost Mohammed took refuge in the
mountainous Hindu Kush.(3)
Eye-Witness Accounts of the First Afghan War
What
was it really like in Afghanistan for the British during the First Afghan War?
We have several books which tell us. Two are by husband and wife. Sir Robert
Sale, one of the British commanders, produced a volume of lithographs:
 |
| Sir Robert Sale |
Sale, Robert Henry, Sir, 1782-1845.
The defence of
Jellalabad /
by Sir R.H. Sale ; drawn on stone by W.L. Walton.
London : Published for the proprietor by
J. Hogarth ..., [1846?]
Sale's
wife, Florentia, Lady Sale, wrote more fully of her Afghanistan experiences:
Sale, Florentia Wynch, Lady, 1790-1853
A journal of
the disasters in Affghanistan, 1841-22.
London, J. Murray, 1843.
When the
First Afghan War began, Colonel Sale was assigned to the command of the 1st
Bengal brigade. He reached Kandahar in April 1839, and in May occupied the
Heart plain. Heading for Kabul, the British stormed the city of Ghazni,
"Sale in person leading the storming column and distinguishing himself in
single combat."(4) They then reached Kabul easily. Sale was awarded the
KCB and promoted to major-general. "He was left, as second-in-command,
with the army of occupation, and ... conducted several small campaigns ending
with the action of Parwan which led directly to the surrender of Dost Mahommed
Khan."(4)
The British forces were now in cantonments,
and everything seemed so peaceful that many of their families came to join them
in Kabul, including Lady Sale and her daughter, also married to a serving
officer. Lady Sale's journal gives a vivid picture of the carefree, elegant—and
in some cases sybaritic—life of the British in Kabul.
Burnes in Kabul
Alexander
Burnes at this time had become the political agent in Kabul. It's an
interesting sidelight on his character—and perhaps helps to clarify the
readiness with which he took to the charming and decorative Afghan costume—that
the life he led there, far from that we might expect of a stern Scottish
soldier, was little short of hedonistic!
 |
| "View of Cabool, from the East", plate facing p.234, from Burnes's Cabool; from an original sketch of Kabul "by Capt. H. Wade, of H.M. 13th Regiment" |
Afghan Uprising
The
Afghans had never truly accepted either the presence of the British or their
puppet ruler, Shah Shuja, and after a while hostilities flared. The Afghan
tribes flocked to support Dost Mohammad's son, Akbar Khan. Burnes had at one
stage left Afghanistan but he was back again: all his advice was ignored and
the British authorities insisted on supporting Shah Shuja instead of Dost
Mohammad Khan.
By the time Sale's brigade was ordered to head
to Jalalabad to clear the vital line of communications to Peshawar on the
North-West Frontier (near the end of the Khyber Pass, close to the
Indian-Afghan border), the situation was very dangerous indeed—not least for
the British forces in cantonments outside Kabul, in a position which would be
nigh impossible to defend.
Murder of Burnes
Violence
flared in Kabul and Afghan rebels, led by Akbar Khan, murdered Burnes. Hedonist
he might have been, but the calmness with which he continued at his post, and
the ferocity with which he fought after the killing of his political assistant,
Major William Broadfoot, killing six assailants before meeting his own fate, won
him a heroic reputation.
Chicanery and Cover-Up
It
seems incredible that all Burnes's excellent advice on tactics was ignored by
the British authorities, just as his original advice against supporting Shah
Shuja had been. In fact, those to whom he reported behaved shockingly badly and
did not pass on all his advice: there was chicanery during his period in Kabul
and then a cover-up: "It came to light in 1861 that some of Burnes'[s]
dispatches from Kabul in 1839 had been altered so as to convey opinions
opposite to his, but Lord Palmerston refused after such a lapse of time to
grant the inquiry demanded in the House of Commons."(1)
Sale Takes Jalalabad
On his
way to "Jellalabad", that is, Jalalabad, Robert Sale received the
news of Burnes's death. He was ordered to return to Kabul as fast as possible,
but using his better judgement, decided not to: "suppressing his personal
desire to return to protect his wife and family, he gave orders to push on."(4)
They reached Jalalabad, a city in eastern Afghanistan at the junction of the
Kabul River and Kunar River, to find a rebel force installed and the way back
to India blocked.
After severe fighting Sale took Jalalabad
on 12 November 1841. Its defensive walls were half-ruined: he immediately set
about making it fit to withstand a siege. His volume of lithographs includes
his detailed drawings of the improvements he made to the defences. (I haven't
digitised any because a small reproduction won't give you any idea of how
impressively detailed they are and how careful a tactician he must have been.) On
7 April 1842 the beleaguered garrison "relieved itself by a brilliant and
completely successful attack on Akbar Khan's lines."(4) General Pollock eventually
arrived with a relieving army, but Jalalabad no longer needed them, thanks to
Sale.
A detailed history of this episode is given
in:
Gleig, G. R. (George Robert), 1796-1888.
Sale's brigade
in Afghanistan : with an account of the seisure and defence of Jellalabad.
London ; John Murray, 1861
If the rest of the British forces could get
as far as Jalalabad, their way back to the Frontier and thence the safety of
India would be relatively clear.
Disastrous Retreat of British from Kabul
In the
meantime the British forces in Kabul had fled, with amongst them Florentia,
Lady Sale, with her daughter and son-in-law. Lady Sale was known in her
lifetime as "the Grenadier in Petticoats"(5): she travelled the world
with her husband on all his postings, but it was perhaps not these travels, as
varied as any soldier's of the time, which earned her the nickname, but her
determination and grit—as her portrait taken in later life attests!
 |
| The "Grenadier in Petticoats" |
Her
journal offers a stringent description of the complete muddle and panic amongst
the British in Kabul when the rebellion broke out. She "gives us a full
and vivid picture of events", reporting on "the anxiety and ineptitude
of Shah Shuja; [and] the procrastination and confusion of command, as men are
readied to take action and told to stand down, marched out of the gates, and
told to return. She does not soften her words in the portrayal of characters,
or dissemble to preserve the good name of anyone".(2)
Panic Leads to Massacre
What
followed this panic was the disastrous British retreat from Kabul in the icy
Afghan winter of 1841/1842. At the beginning of 1842 an agreement was reached with
the rebels for the safe exodus of the British garrison and its dependants from
Afghanistan.(6) They were about 16,500 souls, only about 4,500 being military
personnel and over 12,000 camp followers. Most of the troops were Indian units,
plus one British battalion, the 44th Regiment of Foot. It was ferociously cold:
the worst time imaginable to try to get a large contingent, encumbered as they
must have been by the cook-waggons and all the camp followers' baggage, through
the mountains of Afghanistan.
They were ambushed in the snowbound passes
by Akbar Khan's supporters, with huge slaughter in what was more or less a
running battle, culminating in a massacre at the Gandamak Pass. Fewer than
forty men survived the retreat from Kabul. A handful of British were taken
prisoner. Only one Briton reached the relative safety of the garrison at
Jalalabad, a Dr. William Brydon.(6) It was one of the bitterest episodes in
British military history.
British Hostages in Afghanistan
 |
| Portrait of an Afghan, said to be Akbar Khan, by Vincent Eyre |
Lady
Sale's party—she, her daughter (Mrs Sturt), and other members of British
officers' families—were lucky to be taken prisoner at the beginning of 1842
rather than slaughtered along the way. They were eventually rescued, later in
1842, and got back to India.
Another
account of the British hostages' captivity in Afghanistan is given in:
Eyre, Vincent, Sir, 1811-1881
The military
operations at Cabul, which ended in the retreat and destruction of the British
Army, January 1842 : with a journal of imprisonment in Affghanistan.
London : J. Murray, 1843
Vincent Eyre (later Sir Vincent) was one of the many young Englishmen
who joined the East India Company's army: in his case, the Bengal
Establishment. After 10 years' service he was appointed "Commissary of
Ordnance" to the Kabul field force, in 1839. Like the Sales, his family
went out to Afghanistan expecting the comfortable life of a peaceful posting.
Eyre and his family were also captured during the Afghan uprising led by Akbar
Khan in January 1842. Ironically, it was their months in captivity which saved
their lives. Besides writing a diary of his experiences, Eyre, who was a
considerable artist, also sketched the personalities—officers, women, and even
enemies—whom he met. They are charming works, with a great delicacy of touch.
 |
| Two of Eyre's sketches of the Kabul prisoners |
The
manuscript of the diary is said to have been smuggled out to a friend in
British India. It was published in England as Military Operations at Cabul in 1843 and immediately ran into
several editions. The colour lithographs of his portraits were sold as a set
under the title: Portraits of the Cabul
Prisoners. The lucky Eyres, like Lady Sale, were later rescued. Eyre went
on to a distinguished military career.
End of the War
British
morale was greatly shaken when reports of the disastrous retreat from Kabul
began to filter through. In September 1842 the British forces retook Kabul and
freed the prisoners. Reprisals included great destruction and terrible, vicious
slaughter of civilians. The British then withdrew from Afghanistan through the
Khyber Pass. Dost Mohammad was released and was able to re-establish his
authority in Kabul.(6)
What Would Happen Next?
With
British influence west of the Khyber Pass waning the way was left open for
Russian influence: an opportunity of which the Russian Bear did not fail to
take advantage. We see, in the 30 years following the First Afghan War, steady
Russian encroachment on Afghanistan. By 1873 "Russian control ... extended
as far as the northern bank of the Amu Darya."(6)
Above: Sketch map of the
route of the mighty Amu Darya, the largest river of Central Asia (known in the
19th century as the Oxus River), from its origin in the lofty Pamirs to the
Aral Sea. It forms the northern border of modern Afghanistan. By 1873 most of
the countries of modern Central Asia (shown in pink) were under direct or
indirect Russian control.
References:
(1) "Alexander Burnes", Wikipedia
(2) Bijan Omrani. "Will we make it to
Jalalabad?"
(3) "Dost Mohammad Khan", Wikipedia
(4) "Robert Sale", Wikipedia
(5) "Florentia Sale", Wikipedia
(6) "First Anglo-Afghan War", Wikipedia
--
This post was researched and created by Kathy Boyes
No comments:
Post a Comment